Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-courts-must-evaluate-the-nlrb's-requests-for-section-10(j)-injunctions-under-the-traditional-stringent-four-factor-test-for-preliminary-injunctions-or-under-some-other-more-lenient-standard
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Under the National Labor Relations Act, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issues, prosecutes, and adjudicates complaints alleging that employers committed unfair labor practices. 29 U.S.C. § 160(b). Section 10(j) of the Act authorizes federal district courts, while the NLRB adjudication remains pending, to grant preliminary injunctive relief at the NLRB’s request “as [the court] deems just and proper.” Id. § 160(j). The question presented, on which the courts of appeals are openly and squarely divided, is: Whether courts must evaluate the NLRB’s requests for section 10(j) injunctions under the traditional, stringent four-factor test for preliminary injunctions or under some other more lenient standard. (1)
2024-06-13
Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Thomas, J., delivered the <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-367_f3b7.pdf'>opinion</a> of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Jackson, J., filed an opinion concurring in part, dissenting in part, and concurring in the judgment.
2024-04-23
Argued. For petitioner: Lisa S. Blatt, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Austin Raynor, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
2024-04-12
Reply of petitioner Starbucks Corporation filed. (Distributed)
2024-03-29
Brief amici curiae of Labor and Employment Law Professors filed. (Distributed)
2024-03-29
Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. (Distributed)
2024-03-29
Brief amici curiae of Remedies Scholars filed. (Distributed)
2024-03-28
Brief amici curiae of Starbucks Workers filed. (Distributed)
2024-03-28
Brief amicus curiae of Service Employees International Union (SEIU) filed. (Distributed)
2024-03-28
Brief amici curiae of American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) filed. (Distributed)
2024-03-22
Brief of respondent Kathleen McKinney, Regional Director of Region 15 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board filed.
2024-02-28
Brief amici curiae of Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, et al. filed.
2024-02-28
Brief amicus curiae of Buckeye Institute filed.
2024-02-28
Brief amici curiae of State of Tennessee and Twenty Other States filed.
2024-02-28
Brief amicus curiae of New Civil Liberties Alliance filed.
2024-02-28
Brief amicus curiae of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation filed.
2024-02-28
Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.
2024-02-27
Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.
2024-02-22
Record received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The record is electronic and is available on PACER.
2024-02-21
Brief of petitioner Starbucks Corporation filed.
2024-02-21
Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
2024-02-20
Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.
2024-02-16
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, April 23, 2024.
2024-02-08
Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Starbucks Corporation.
2024-01-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2024.
2023-12-20
Reply of petitioner Starbucks Corporation filed. (Distributed)
2023-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-06
Brief of respondent M. Kathleen McKinney, Regional Director of Region 15 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board in opposition filed.
2023-11-06
Brief amici curiae of Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, et al. filed.
2023-11-06
Brief amicus curiae of New Civil Liberties Alliance filed.
2023-11-06
Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. filed.
2023-10-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 6, 2023.
2023-10-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 6, 2023 to December 6, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-10-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 6, 2023)