No. 23-5042
Daniel Robinson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conspiracy constructive-amendment criminal-procedure due-process federal-rule-of-evidence fifth-amendment grand-jury law-enforcement-testimony opinion-evidence prosecutorial-overreach
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment Privacy
FifthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court's guidance on constructive amendments in conspiracy cases is necessary to protect criminal defendants' Fifth Amendment rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether this Court’s guidance on constructive amendments in conspiracy cases is necessary to protect criminal defendants’ Fifth Amendment rights. 2. Whether this Court should set limits on what law enforcement testimony should be admitted as opinion evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 701.
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 4, 2023)
Attorneys
Daniel Robinson
Alison Brill — Office of the Federal Public Defender, D.N.J., Petitioner
Alison Brill — Office of the Federal Public Defender, D.N.J., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent