No. 23-5077
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-court appeal-of-right appellate-procedure appointed-counsel court-access due-process legal-representation ninth-circuit pro-se pro-se-litigation supplemental-brief
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit violate the defendant-appellant's due process right of access to the court in denying his pro se supplemental brief?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED In a first appeal of right, did the U.S. Court of Appeals for the | Ninth Circuit (“Ninth Circuit”) violate defendant-appellant Ronald Boyajian’s (“Petitioner”) Due Process right of access to the court in denying Petitioner's filing a pro se supplemental brief raising issues and arguments not raised by appointed counsel? |
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-28
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 11, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent