No. 23-5166

Antwoyn Anderson v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-07-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act federal-drug-schedules federal-firearm-offense firearm-offense jackson-v-united-states prior-state-drug-offense serious-drug-offense state-drug-offense statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-05-30 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Armed Career Criminal Act's definition of 'serious drug offense' incorporates the federal drug schedules in effect at the time of the federal firearm offense, or at the time of the prior state drug offense

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Armed Career Criminal Act’s definition of “serious drug offense,” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(A)Gi), incorporates the federal drug schedules in effect at the time of the federal firearm offense, or at the time of the prior state drug offense.’ 1 This Court has already granted certiorari to review this question in Jackson v. United States (No. 22-6640) (cert. granted May 15, 2023). i

Docket Entries

2024-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2024.
2023-09-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-21
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2023-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 21, 2023)

Attorneys

Antwoyn Anderson
Andrew Lee AdlerFederal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent