No. 23-5302
Larry Rederick v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights eighth-circuit fourth-amendment law-enforcement probable-cause search-and-seizure traffic-stop traffic-stops unreasonable-search
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision Authorizes Unreasonably Prolonged Traffic Stops and Unreasonable Searching of a Separate Vehicle Without Probable Cause as Required Under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1) Whether the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision Authorizes Unreasonably Prolonged Traffic Stops and Unreasonable Searching of a Separate Vehicle Without Probable Cause as Required Under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. i
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-08-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 7, 2023)
Attorneys
Larry Dean Rederick
Justin Lee Bell — May, Adam, Gerdes & Thompson, LLP, Petitioner
Justin Lee Bell — May, Adam, Gerdes & Thompson, LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent