No. 23-5309
Jerome Stanley Carlos, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals certificate-of-appealability circuit-court-review criminal-law criminal-statute due-process force-clause habeas-corpus sentencing sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3) is a 'crime of violence' under the 'force clause' of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. By denying Petitioner’s defacto motion to expand the Certificate of Appealability, did the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals err in holding that 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3) is a “crime of violence” under the “force clause” of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-08-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 8, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent