Brenda M. Johnson v. Catholic Community Services, et al.
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Is Brenda M Johnson an employee under WSDOT for protective activity clause
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. ls Brenda M Johnson an employee under WSDOT for protective activity clause 6 USC 1142 ; 6 USC 1131 (5) Bankruptcy chapter 7 11 USC 524: Effect of discharge, Article I, Section 8, Clause 4: , 2. Was she treated differently for under protective Activity under State and Federal laws?( Such as pay and benefit: } discharge of debt , housing, property rights ,fair credit and personal injuries obtained ) 3. The orders /Judgement were they legally bound by refusing to sign? | 4. Did the defendants make a appearance and defend the allegations? | S. Was Brenda M Johnson demoted from FTA and Electronic Transaction Consultants Corporation due to retaliatic for reporting fiance, and safety and health issues within the organization? : 6. Was Brenda M Johnson treated indifferent by the standards of laws in her discrimination claim and seized property? 7. Was Brenda M Johnson blacklisted in employment which violations of occurred denial 1 st amendment right du process of the law, enforcement, bill of rights , 13 amendment Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, 8.was Brenda M Johnson falsely impressioned and held captive in 2016 and 2022 9, Was Brenda M Johnson second amendment right violated? 10. Was an abuse of Authority obstruction of justice and waste of government funding violated against Brenda M Johnson violation of humanity rights? 11. Did the defendants deny Brenda M Johnson her seventh amendment right of the Constitution? 12. Is Brenda M Johnson a frontline employee for WSDOT which works in the Judiciary Department? a | 13. Lower pay then colleges | ' & 1H. Did he court pe tis, DRerdla Ki ddwsen A FRA lore Sones é ry t 15, Whar tho Paks Didat appear 4 Detind called Deferdarts [Apps {lees \D) at Onte pe Was a entry Def Real fxle 55e) 7