No. 23-5799
Donald L. Missimer, Jr. v. Jay Forshey, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-11-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ohio Supreme Court erred in its interpretation and application of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : 28-5799 ; Tithe wb. : Supreme Court of the United States Supreme Cou US : FILED ; . PETITION F IT OF CERTIORARI . ype | ON FOR WR SEP 28 2023 ; ; OFFICE oF THE Cua Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgmen below. OPINIONS BELOW : This case is from the Supreme Court of Ohio. _ . The Opinion of the Ohio Supreme Court, which is the highest State court to : review the merits, appears at
Docket Entries
2023-11-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-26
Waiver of right of respondent Warden Forshey to respond filed.
2023-09-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 17, 2023)
Attorneys
Donald L. Miissimer
Donald L. Missimer Jr. — Petitioner
Warden Forshey
Michael Jason Hendershot — Ohio Attorney General's Office, Respondent