No. 23-6195
Lonzell J. Threats v. Barbara von Blanckensee, Warden
Tags: 28-usc-2241 civil-procedure deference deference-standard habeas-corpus judicial-review legal-review military-court military-courts mixed-questions questions-of-law
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Must a court reviewing a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition challenging a military-court conviction extend absolute deference to the military court's rulings on questions of law, and mixed questions of law and fact, that do not involve uniquely military matters?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Must a court reviewing a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition challenging a military-court conviction extend absolute deference to the military court’s rulings on questions of law, and mixed questions of law and fact, that do not involve uniquely military matters? RULE 14.1(b) STATEMENT (i) All
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-11
Waiver of right of respondent Barbara VonBlankensee, Warden to respond filed.
2023-12-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 8, 2024)
Attorneys
Barbara VonBlankensee, Warden
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Lonzell Threats
Daniel Lee Kaplan — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Daniel Lee Kaplan — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner