No. 23-6223
Christopher Louis Sindone v. Michigan Department of Corrections, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process employment employment-law federal-habeas-corpus harassment legal-standing retaliation statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Arbitration
Arbitration
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the defendants retaliate against the plaintiff after he filed a federal habeas corpus complaint by firing him from his job, then further retaliate by harassing him on the job?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : ON ED
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent Warden Gary Miniard to respond filed.
2024-01-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-11-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 10, 2024)
Attorneys
Christopher Louis Sindone
Christopher Louis Sindone — Petitioner
Christopher Louis Sindone — Petitioner
Warden Gary Miniard
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent