Did Edward Mandlebaum and Alexandra Perez Halper f/k/a Alexandra Perez ! Cid fail to state cause of action for the relief which they were granted

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Did Edward Mandlebaum and Alexandra Perez Halper f/k/a Alexandra Perez ! Cid fail to state cause of action for the relief which they were granted. | OPINIONS BELOW | The decisions by the New York States Court of Appeals, Northern District Court, and Second Circuit Court deny Mr. Disanto, the Petitions even the most basic of Federal and statelaws that prohibit disability-based discrimination by state courts and require the courts to provide people with disabilities reasonable accommodations allowing for the full participation in the court system. Unless deemed incompetent. Individuals with disabilities. 28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.150(a) Administrative Tribunals: Administrative agencies are public entities and places of public accommodation, and both the ADA and the WLAD apply to administrative agencies conducting adjudicative hearings. State and local government services, ‘ programs and activities — including those of administrative and judicial courts — : must be “readily accessible to and usable by” individuals with disabilities. 28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.150(a). For the most part, this Guide applies directly to administrative tribunals. Administrative hearing procedures vary from agency to agency, but are generally informal and flexible. Many hearings are conducted by telephone, involve pro se parties, and are held in a variety of locations ... to meet special needs. Parties should have notice of the hearing date, time, location, and procedure early enough that a party or witness with special needs can ask to be accommodated ... Along with the notice of hearing, agencies should provide information listing hearing rights and addressing the most frequently asked questions about the process, including the right to reasonable accommodation or special assistance. Contact information (including a TTY number) should be included. 1 JURISDICTION ' The Petitioner, Mr. Disanto, disabled in 2012 with a Traumatic Brain Injury, was denied equal accommodations in each court subsequently. The Respondents' intention and negative effect on the Petitioner was clearly outlined by Attorney Richard DuVall who respectfully addressed the Ulster Supreme Court following formal medical diagnosis and judicial 28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.150(a) 18 U.S.C. §1962(b) 18 U.S. Code § 2314 ‘ 18 USC Sec. 1589 42, USC § 1983 CACI No. 1520. | RC 2323.51 Rule 3.210. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES | PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW [] For cases from federal courts: The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at