No. 23-6309
Elvin Farris v. Vector Construction, Inc.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: amendment civil-rights discovery-rule EEOC eeoc-charge employment-discrimination legal-amendment statute-of-limitations termination-notice
Key Terms:
Environmental Immigration
Environmental Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the petitioner been allowed to amend the EEOC charge
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : 1. Should the petitioner been allowed to amend the EEOC charge 2. Did the discovery of petitioner termination start a new limitations clock 3. Should the petitioner been allowed to use the discovery rule ; 4. Was the October notice of termination a separate act that happened in October . : 5. Did the evidence show a meaningful difference when it came to Vector Construction motive 7 6. The the termination fall outside the scope of the EEOC charge ; | { ‘
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-12-29
Waiver of right of respondent Vector Construction, Inc. to respond filed.
2023-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2024)
Attorneys
Vector Construction, Inc.
Matthew Tews — Stinson LLP, Respondent
Matthew Tews — Stinson LLP, Respondent