No. 23-6415
IFP
Tags: capital-case capital-punishment criminal-procedure death-penalty due-process equal-protection first-degree-murder pulley-v-harris relative-culpability sentencing supreme-court-review
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment Privacy
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-02-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the affirmance by the Supreme Court of the State of Florida of defendant's conviction for first degree murder and sentence of death was clearly erroneous as the Florida Supreme Court improperly interpreted and applied this Court's decision in Pulley v. Harris to disallow a relative culpability analysis
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW CAPITAL CASE IL: WHETHER THE AFFIRMANCE BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA OF DEFENDANT'S CONVICTION FOR FIRST DEGREE MURDER AND SENTENCE OF DEATH WAS CLEARLY ERRONEOUS AS THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT IMPROPERLY INTERPRETED AND APPLIED THIS COURT’S DECISION IN PULLEY v. HARRIS TO DISALLOW A RELATIVE CULPABILITY ANALYSIS
Docket Entries
2024-02-26
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2024.
2024-01-25
Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
2023-12-27
Attorneys
Cristian Cruz
Jose Rafael Rodriguez — Law Offices of J. Rafael Rodriguez, Petitioner
Jose Rafael Rodriguez — Law Offices of J. Rafael Rodriguez, Petitioner
Office of the Attorney General Florida