No. 23-6421
Remberto Rivera v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law agency-guidance circuit-split deference judicial-deference sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation stinson-v-united-states supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court's decision in Kisor v. Wilkie prescribes the amount of deference to be paid to the United States Sentencing Commission's commentary to the Sentencing Guidelines
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether this Court’s decision in Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S. Ct. 2400 (2019), now prescribes the amount of deference to be paid to the United States Sentencing Commission’s commentary to the Sentencing Guidelines. ii
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 5, 2024)
Attorneys
Remberto Rivera
Christopher Aaron Holt — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Christopher Aaron Holt — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent