No. 23-6553
Danjuan Antonio McBride v. Virginia
Response WaivedIFP
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
FifthAmendment DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Virginia Supreme Court erred in holding that the petitioner's Fifth Amendment right against double jeopardy was not violated
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the Virginia Supreme Court erred when it held that Petitioner’s Fifth Amendment right not to be put twice in Jeopardy was not violated when the trial court directed a verdict in his favor, then “reversed” itself, and allowed the Commonwealth to reopen her case and present additional evidence. Under Virginia law, the grant of a motion to strike required the trial court to enter a judgment of acquittal. Regardless, after such a ruling, the trial court sent the charges to the jury, and Mr. McBride was convicted.
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-25
Waiver of right of respondent Commonwealth of Virginia to respond filed.
2024-01-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 23, 2024)
Attorneys
Commonwealth of Virginia
Andrew Nathan Ferguson — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Andrew Nathan Ferguson — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Danjuan Antonio McBride
Donna Lynne Biderman — Law Office of Donna L.Biderman, PLLC, Petitioner
Donna Lynne Biderman — Law Office of Donna L.Biderman, PLLC, Petitioner