No. 23-6688
Christian Alejandro Estrella v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment criminal-procedure fourth-amendment law-enforcement parole parole-search police-authority probable-cause search-and-seizure suspicionless-search suspicionless-seizure
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does probable cause to believe that a person is on parole suffice for a suspicionless seizure and search or is knowledge of parole status required?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED A police officer may seize and search a person on parole without suspicion. See Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 848, 857 (2006). But the officer must first determine that this person is a parolee rather than an ordinary citizen. The question presented is: Does probable cause to believe that a person is on parole suffice for a suspicionless seizure and search or is knowledge of parole status required? i
Docket Entries
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 8, 2024)
Attorneys
Christian Estrella
Yevgeniy Mikhail Parkman — Federal Public Defender, N.D. Cal., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent