No. 23-6749

Craig Alan Morrison v. United States

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-02-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: circuit-split criminal-sentencing judicial-interpretation physical-restraint plain-text recurring-issue sentencing-commission sentencing-guidelines victim-definition
Latest Conference: 2024-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether a defendant should receive an increased sentence under U.S.S.G. § 3A1.3 for having "physically restrained" a victim, where the conduct at issue is nothing like the narrow examples the Guidelines use to define that term, such as "the victim . . . being tied, bound, or locked up"?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a defendant should receive an increased sentence under U.S.S.G. § 3A1.3 for having 'physically restrained' a victim, where the conduct at issue is nothing like the narrow examples the Guidelines use to define that term, such as 'the victim . . . being tied, bound, or locked up'?

Docket Entries

2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 15, 2024)

Attorneys

Craig Alan Morrison
John Carl ArceciOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent