No. 23-6789
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: evidence grand-jury grand-jury-testimony impeachment impeachment-evidence jury-instructions prior-inconsistent-statement substantive-evidence witness witness-testimony
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-03-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a party knowingly call a witness it expects to testify contrary to previous statements in order for those statements to entered as substantive evidence before a jury?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Can a party knowingly call a witness it expects to testify contrary to previous statements in order for those statements to entered as substantive evidence before a jury? 2. Is giving the standard 2.13 Prior Inconsistent Statement as Impeachment instructions confusing, contradictory or misleading when prior grand jury testimony was used for impeachment and is also entered as substantive evidence? 2
Docket Entries
2024-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2024.
2024-03-06
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2024-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 21, 2024)
Attorneys
Florida