substantive-evidence
6 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23-6789 | Randolph Maya v. Florida | Florida | 2024-02-20 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | evidence grand-jury grand-jury-testimony impeachment impeachment-evidence jury-instructions prior-inconsistent-statement substantive-evidence witness witness-testimony | Can a party knowingly call a witness it expects to testify contrary to previous statements in order for those statements to entered as substantive evi… |
| 19-8528 | Melvin Russell v. United States | Tenth Circuit | 2020-05-22 | Denied | IFP | circuit-split complainant complainant-testimony criminal-defendant evidence-proffering federal-rule-of-evidence-412 federal-rules-of-evidence rape-shield-rule sexual-behavior substantive-evidence | Whether a criminal defendant must proffer substantive evidence regarding a complainant's other sexual behavior under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 |
| 19-6232 | Jason James Neiheisel v. United States | Eleventh Circuit | 2019-10-09 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | appellate-review burden-of-proof circuit-split criminal-conviction criminal-procedure demeanor due-process jury-verdict prosecutorial-questioning reversible-error substantive-evidence sufficiency-of-evidence | Whether the Eleventh Circuit, on review for sufficiency of evidence, can affirm a conviction citing the verdict itself; on the supposition the jury co… |
| 19-5620 | Damien Hyde v. Illinois | Illinois | 2019-08-16 | Denied | IFP | 5th-amendment civil-rights coerced-statements confrontation-clause constitutional-rights criminal-evidence criminal-procedure due-process evidence non-defendant-witnesses substantive-evidence witness-testimony | Whether the admission of coerced statements by non-defendant witnesses deprives a defendant of due process of law when used as substantive evidence of… |
| 18-9013 | Michael P. Crenshaw v. Illinois | Illinois | 2019-04-26 | Denied | IFP | 14th-amendment 5th-amendment coerced-confession constitutional-claim due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance judicial-review miranda-rights procedural-bar statute-of-limitations substantive-evidence | Whether the use of a coerced confession as substantive evidence at trial violates due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments |
| 18-6667 | Khaled Elbeblawy v. United States | Eleventh Circuit | 2018-11-13 | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | confession criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-evidence impeachment impeachment-use-waiver medicare-fraud plea-agreement plea-bargaining rule-11 substantive-evidence united-states-v-mezzanatto | Does the impeachment-use waiver doctrine established by the Court in United States v. Mezzanatto, 513 U.S. 196, permit the government to introduce in … |