Should the Title V Exemption extended to the Federal Aviation Administration from the Office of Personnel Management be considered Unconstitutional?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED , ~~ * . ; I, Jn the Interest of Public Safety and Public Trust should the Title V Exemption extended to | : the Federal Aviation Administration from the Office of Personnel Management be | : ue eS corisidered Unconstitutional since reports of Waste, Fraud, and Abuse are Extreme, Well : : Documented, and Severely Dangerous to the Flying Public, Workforce, and Society? 2. Should OPM’s Oversight of the FAA be considered Unconstitutional since the FAA has a History of Retaliating against Whistleblowers? 3. Ifthe DOJ said Ash v DOT and Ash v OPM are Similar cases then why was Ash v DOT transferred to the Western District of Oklahoma and Ash v OPM transferred to the District Court of Maryland, and why didn’t the DOJ request a Consolidation of Cases IAW FRCP 42? 4. Ifthe Federal Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has Exclusive Jurisdiction of MSPB Final Decisions then why did Defendants request Ash v OPM to be transferred to the District Court of Maryland? 5. Ifthe MSPB said Appellants’ claims should be heard by the EEOC on 4/27/21, and the EEOC said Appellants’ claims should be heard by the MSPB on 7/20/21, and Ash v DOT was filed in the District Court for the District of Columbia on 9/9/21, then how could the Defendants argue claims were not Exhausted without committing Perjury under 18 U.S.C. § 1621 or Violating Civil RICO under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) and (d)? ii Ash v DOT . | 22-6195 G i : ORIGINAL