Whether the alleged wrongful traffic stop arose in 2008 or 2009, and the subsequent default proceedings and abuse of power by state officials

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whereas, the argument for the alleged wrongful traffic stop arose in Kankakee County Court January 8, 2009 0), when Plaintiff filed a hearing for JDP, as shown in U.S. Dist. 20-cv-05862 [#99], the motion to dismiss and suppress evidence was sought by Plaintiff on February 19, 2009 [100], therefore, Plaintiff was no longer alleged wrongful traffic stop, but default, after the arresting officer continue failing to appear. Therefore, while the argument for the alleged wrongful traffic stop, arose in Kankakee County Court, in 2008, with the hearing for JDP, seeking default began in 2009, which present the following questions: 1. Whether, Il. App. 1-13-2109, was affirmed, U.S. Sup. 14-1173, and it affirmed, default was sought in both Court of Claims Cases, under 74 Ill. Admin Code Sec. 790.100, in October 2012. 2. Whether, the Original Complaint, filed in 2010, as stated in U.S. Dist. 20-cv-05862, arose from Secretary of State Police Officer, BRIAN SIMS [#95-101], default in 2019, and the State abuse of power to evade default, Ephesians 6:12 [#2], and not the alleged wrongful traffic stop, in 2008. 3. Whether, trying to defend [#95-101] in Illinois Court of Claims, would only support Plaintiff's arguments, but Defendant Jesse White, was also the Ex-Officio Clerk of the Court of Claims and he chose not to recuse. i 4. Whether, Plaintiff filed a second Court of Claims complaint, due to Defendants, which included, Ilinois Secretary of State, Jesse White, whom also the Ex-Officio Clerk of Illinois Court of Claims as Defendant in both complaint, therefore, the Judges and they abuse of power in the original complaint Jesse White, Ex-the Ex-Officio Clerk, was required to recuse, but instead violated Plaintiffs rights U.S. App. 15-2186 [#288-301]. 5. Whether, U.S. Dist. 20-cv-05862, considered Plaintiffs Original Complaint, filed in 2010, was seeking damages for alleged wrongful, by order of the Court of Claims on February 28, 2013, as of March 2013, Plaintiff amended it, he was seeking default (#13). 6. Whether, the Second Court of Claims Complaint, that never sought damages for alleged wrongful traffic, it sought, like U.S. Dist. 20-cv-05862, an injunction for the Court of Claims to do it's duty under 74 Ili. Admin Code Sec. 790.100 issue the default [#148], 7. Whether, when U.S. Sup. 14-1173, affirmed, IL. App. 1-13-2109, it affirmed, default in both Court of Claims cases and Aerchert v. Court of Claims, 203 Il. 2D 257, 261 (2003),"certiorari will not lie until final judgment has been entered by the tribunal whose decision is sought to be reviewed”. , 8. Whether, U.S. Dist. 20-cv-05862 and U.S. App. ALL 21-2896, agreed Plaintiff default, but certiorari will not lie until final judgment has been entered in the matter of the Court of Claims Judges and it Clerk, Mr. Jesse White, also violating Plaintiff rights to due process, since the alleged violation of his right under §1983, authorizes Federal Court to issue an injunction [#299]. 9. Whether, the Defendants in U.S. Dist. Court 20 CV 5862, clearly lied when stated Secretary of State, Jesse White was not apart of the case, to evade Plaintiff's argument of Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 209 U.S. 123-4. 10. Whether, Judge Ilana Diamond Rover decision in U.S. App. 21-2896, made weeks after giving defendant White, her "Honorable Hana Diamond Rover Lifetime Achievement Award", was cause for her to recuse; it not only reviewed her own decision in U.S. App. 15-3096, without vacating, nor amending it, therefore, causing a Judicial Conflict, but U.S. App. 21-2896, also review U.S. Sup. 14-1173, without authority.