Does this Court's decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey require that the Government prove beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury that there is a nexus between a potential predicate act and a RICO conspiracy before the defendant can be subjected to an enhanced penalty based on the predicate act?

QUESTION PRESENTED Does this Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), require that the Government prove beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury that there is a nexus between a potential predicate act and a RICO conspiracy before the defendant can be subjected to an enhanced penalty based on the predicate act? i