No. 23-7302

In Re Michael A. Farrell

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-04-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2254d due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel equal-protection evidentiary-hearing fourteenth-amendment full-and-fair-hearing reasonable-doubt state-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2024-06-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the U.S. District Court violate petitioners XIV Amendment right to due-process, equal-protection, 28-usc-2254d

Question Presented (from Petition)

Questions Presented . Pg#t 1. Did the U.S. District Court violate petitioners XIV Amendment right to due process, equal protection of the law and 28 U.S.C. 2254(d) by failing to hold an evidentiary hearing after acknowledging the petitioner did not receive a full and _ fair hearing in state court? ‘ Mf 2. Is the standard for ‘evidence significant to proceed' equal to the XIV Amendment guarantee 'evidence beyond a reasonable doubt' as the U.S.District court ruled it ; was ? Let 3. Was petitioner denied his XIV Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel (by counsel's own omission) for . a) failing to investigate, b) failing to consult with : an independent medical expert ? | Bi, ‘ 4. Can focusing on one part of an answer distort the content and meaning of the _ . overall statement? | ‘AA . oe .

Docket Entries

2024-09-06
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-08-15
DISTRIBUTED.
2024-07-17
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
2024-04-10
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 24, 2024)

Attorneys

Michael A Farrell
Michael A. Farrell — Petitioner
Michael A. Farrell — Petitioner