| 23-7302 |
In Re Michael A. Farrell |
|
2024-04-24 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2254d due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel equal-protection evidentiary-hearing fourteenth-amendment full-and-fair-hearing reasonable-doubt state-court |
Did the U.S. District Court violate petitioners XIV Amendment right to due-process, equal-protection, 28-usc-2254d |
| 22-6851 |
David Freeman v. John Q. Hamm, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-02-23 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2254d appellate-procedure due-process federal-habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel party-presentation sixth-amendment state-post-conviction |
Whether a court of appeals violates the principle of party presentation and due process rights when it raises an issue sua sponte that the parties did… |
| 22-6276 |
Lester S. Barney v. Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2022-12-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2254d faretta-right faretta-v-california habeas-corpus habeas-review ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review pro-se-representation self-representation strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
Whether the state court unreasonably determined that Lester S. Barney did not clearly and unequivocally assert his right to proceed pro se |
| 18-8151 |
Loren Williamson, III v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-02-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2254a 28-usc-2254d conflict-of-interest due-process due-process-equal-protection-disparity equal-protection parties-to-the-proceeding post-conviction post-conviction-process right-to-counsel sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-right-to-counsel |
Whether a Certificate of Appealability should issue |