Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment prohibits the execution of a prisoner who was intellectually disabled at the time of the offense

No question identified. : | . | A is PRESENTED | Quest, é Mich Due proce Gs gual Proted lie of Jaw ¢ laa) 2 i Mp A "a ‘A rd june A] he Aide Sate 1286 | GR e ° Ad, lapt_O he C2 LAtNe!K Q [2] ? | Detestioss Has’ AS fei ex-Postae Bis Gal d ¢wapreterM vaets 45'S | More pap 1 eC gar oO p_(tatete Std, S 8G | © ral G Zi AttG f f W te oO MOCS of ? ce | QQ oe HH BE | Dor otitis ia a row’ BL MAA MEL Dé, er of Serfous | those prue| tower Aleck _Prathebed swe pbyypsieel jag | vs Loa? ay baht hnnsinnet sino [3 ‘ e already at fer: vaLd Eighth mestmiewT VUialet: 2 | Crue] awd ususual Puwshmenl nfholes, _. | a Larhes A he tbtamohega Cotes) late's Ap dor rte JS te fact | Q z Assistaw! A MOs vera tL WhAea hose tu 2 brasechs ok . | a tauel Maser? Care ees ae . : : | Queskci, Ae AFA? Zs if les al boc the Ad nebo Combe sthale's Attorneys 7 | Prdcberpmasg! tia Ci asc Ke rye iL whey ¢ cu | hey G e x audégiel of bices of Ae Col L des they Q fe fofe « ao] . : @ ; Cues PREDER omdinues : let ee & ae d G__ FaCEATT , fl ALCL (sthea OMe "Oke | __ tro auc _Attorvey'S Brizk thal there were Mo divect | Lis H\eleder ty Cf EMEK aN ‘4 Aysice! eurdence 2 | udee fo eye a rad Advaws a guitly jee, | Thee Mie me falter the sarte Crrewrl Comupttr, je dew Coys: dere d _ | gwd Caled o 5 Stale Habeas Corpus by birds of s+ bem Po crvollous . + raw Lb au abuse of deserekrosc 2 eee ie ef § Bs . | he Guestiat i VAN Wimnebag 0 ent cal Assrsdeack | 2 Cte Va Lo ra ky hoe Mes, BE kL. Executive ot Leer: aid . f the Cu “gems udoes See's Yee ty e Polbduner tse € oct Case [a CM Le y' Z Xs # Q4 Die ite dee | lelondat — Pedsrosec Mathias pot Os ° Q Le * 2L4AGb eek “A ATL he eferted arch S | “gh eter te ge yeu belie the Stabe uel was bakerc _ thet i : po osc e a 2 hoa eb J atvaluntbury, bog 2 (8