Was the district court's imposition of supervision conditions requiring Mr. Hood to obtain some form of work/employment violated the Eighth Amendment given Mr. Hood's ill health and advanced age?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Was the district court's imposition of supervision conditions requiring Mr. Hood to obtain some form of work/employment violated the Eighth Amendment given Mr. Hood's ill health and advanced age? 2. Did the Court of Appeals’ interpretation of the supervision conditions under review cause them to violate U.S. Constitution Article III’s prohibition against the impermissible delegation of authority to the probation office?