No. 23-7439
Basil Loud Hawk v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-law criminal-statute federal-crimes federal-criminal-law force-clause sentencing sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation violent-crime violent-crimes
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether federal second-degree murder in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1(a) qualifies as a 'crime of violence' under the force clause in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether federal second-degree murder in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1(a) qualifies as a “crime of violence” under the force clause in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A). i
Docket Entries
2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2024)
Attorneys
Basil Loud Hawk
Molly C. Quinn — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Molly C. Quinn — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent