No. 23-7446
Erika Jacobs v. Quest Diagnostics
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process employment free-speech jurisdictional-issue legal-standing standing statutory-provisions supreme-court-procedure writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its judgment on the petitioner's claims
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED |. Ord tho louser woutt vad ocourr of od on Ora Tobe juilyement Co tad efpeaks crt oe loa per a Xs Woe Kor dN oe l i Ste Loorkplare nes pr noe oceep table Pet toned Wes walled ‘ Wy Berzon The. othordy at k le a Nye by orsons of pusnondy ot fer PREF ermpby meh: QLuest sop peleen gothalie gil mental Case Notte oy ubiful Tacs g& Mofon to he Use Cirn he Plinth pute @ uy or | re Ts Nee tah tLe Tog Yee jad cial or agpen\s Fro eh etal court 5 tou Crore, Woy flaunt and tae evident aa (4
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2024-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-05-31
Waiver of right of respondent Quest Diagnostics to respond filed.
2024-04-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2024)
Attorneys
Erika Jacobs
Erika Jacobs — Petitioner
Quest Diagnostics