No. 23-7473
Cody Ray Leveke, aka Cody Meyer, aka Cody Ray Meyers v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-intent criminal-law due-process first-amendment free-speech jury-instructions subjective-intent supreme-court supreme-court-precedent threat-standard
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-06-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether jury instructions based on Elonis v. United States (2015) sufficiently encompass the requirement of 'subjective intent to threaten,' as articulated by the Supreme Court in Counterman v. Colorado (2028), or if such instructions fall short of this standard
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether jury instructions based on Elonis v. United States (2015) sufficiently encompass the requirement of "subjective intent to threaten," as articulated by the Supreme Court in Counterman v. Colorado (2028), or if such instructions fall short of this standard. i
Docket Entries
2024-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
2024-05-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 13, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent