Where the discriminatory act was refusing admission of Petitioner (a Black entertainer) to the business' premises for work because her admission would exceed the business' racial quota limiting the number of Black entertainers on the premises simultaneously, and notwithstanding the business' requirement that the entertainers pay for each such admission for work, were such acts of exclusion taking place within the limitations period 'discrete acts' of discrimination starting a new limitations clock, as announced in National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101, 113 (2002), or did the fact that there were similar exclusions of Petitioner before the limitations period start the limitations period accrual, thereby barring actions based on the exclusions of Petitioner within the limitations period?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Where the discriminatory act was refusing admission of Petitioner (a Black entertainer) to the business’ premises for work because her admission would exceed the business’ racial quota limiting the number of Black entertainers on the premises simultaneously, and notwithstanding the business’ requirement that the entertainers pay for each such admission for work, were such acts of exclusion taking place within the limitations period “discrete acts” of discrimination starting a new limitations clock, as announced in National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101, 113 (2002), or did the fact that there were similar exclusions of Petitioner before the limitations period start the limitations period accrual, thereby barring actions based on the exclusions of Petitioner within the limitations period?