Whether A COA Should Issue Because Jurists Of Reason Could Debate Or Agree That Congress Could Did Not Authorize Federal Enforcement Of § 1591 To Purely Local Pandering and Prostitution Cases As A Matter Of Law And The Due Process Clause And Whether The Claim Was Subject To Procedural Default Doctrine? If Not, Whether A COA Should Issue Because Jurists Of Reason Could Debate Or Agree That § 1591 Enforcement Invades The Powers Reserved To The States By The Tenth Amendment To The Constitution And Whether The Claim Was Subject To Procedural Default Doctrine?

Whether A COA Should Issue Because §1591 Is Unconstitutionally Vague As-Applied To The Petitioner In Violation Of The Due Process Clause And Whether The District Court Was Incorrect The Claim Was Procedurally Defaulted?

Whether 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591 And 2443(a) Are Unconstitutionally Overbroad As-Applied To The Petitioner In Violation Of The Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause And Whether The District Court Was Incorrect That The Claim Was Procedurally Defaulted?

Whether a COA should issue due to federal enforcement of §1591 to local pandering and prostitution cases