Deqwon Saquod Lewis v. United States
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration Patent Privacy
Whether a COA should issue due to federal enforcement of §1591 to local pandering and prostitution cases
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 7 ISSUE ONE Whether A COA Should Issue Because Jurists Of Reason Could Debate Or Agree That Congress Could Did Not Authorize Federal Enforcement Of § 1591 To Purely Local Pandering and Prostitution Cases As A Matter Of Law And The Due Process Clause And Whether The Claim Was Subject To Procedural Default Doctrine? If Not, Whether A COA Should Issue Because Jurists Of Reason Could Debate Or Agree That § 1591 Enforcement Invades The Powers Reserved To The States By The Tenth Amendment To The Constitution And Whether The Claim Was Subject To Procedural Default Doctrine? ISSUE TWO Whether A COA Should Issue Because §1591 Is Unconstitutionally Vague AsApplied To The Petitioner In Violation Of The Due Process Clause And Whether The District Court Was Incorrect The Claim Was Procedurally Defaulted? ISSUE THREE Whether 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591 And 2443(a) Are Unconstitutionally Overbroad AsApplied To The Petitioner In Violation Of The Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause And Whether The District Court Was Incorrect That The Claim Was Procedurally Defaulted? i me Il.