Whether the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment rights of the plaintiff were violated due to religious discrimination, harassment, and academic exclusion by public hospitals affiliated with a university

Questions Presented 1) Whether the First Circuit Court of ‘Appeals and the District Court erred in dismissing Mr. Sanchez's claims of . religious discrimination, harassment, and academic exclusion under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, despite compelling and irrefutable evidence that the operate public hospitals. 2) Whether the enforcement of Covid-19 mRNA inoculation mandates without religious exemptions by Lifespan Corporation and Care New England Health System, as part of their affiliation with Brown University’s Warren Alpert Medical School (WAMS), constitutes a violation of the rights to free exercise of : | religion and equal protection under the law. | 3) Whether the lower courts failed to adequately. consider and address’ thé “substantial and ‘documented evidence provided by the pro se PlaintiffAppellant, while predominantly relying on the filings and arguments of counsel, thereby undermining the fairness and integrity of the judicial process. 4) Whether the lower courts’ failure to.address the evidence and arguments regarding iv . ’ his natural immunity and the discriminatory impact of the policies necessitate Supreme Court intervention to ensure consistent and uniform application of constitutional protections against religious discrimination. _ oF 5) Whether a party may motion to dismiss. prior to attempted service of summons, how this might impact judicial fairness, and whether a district court may deny a pro se litigant’s timely-filed amended complaint within 21 days of successful summons service. II. Related Cases, . ; Sanchez v. Brown University et al., No. 1:23-00343-JJMPAS, Rhode Island District Court oy Sanchez v. Brown University et al., No. 23-1983, First Circuit Court of Appeals III. |