Question not identified

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Ive kept fighting for 6 years already. The 2nd Summary Judgment at Federal Colorado and Appeal Courts is seriously unjust and has many errors. The key words for facts and legal issues include “Salem”, “deceptive reassignments”, “racism”, “threat”, “zero classroom support”, “job performance”, “workload”, “school RIB reduction”, “District non-renewal with three-years’ penalty”, “insubordinate”, “PII-SSN violation”, “NOA & Disqualified”. The following presented questions are selected from more than two dozen questions with legal issues and fact details in deep insight. The path of the true answers can logically prove my four-allegations of ; Discrimination, neither “due to performance’, nor “no genuine fact dispute” Q1-Shall Supreme Court Justice check if lower Federal-Court Judges used upside down Cause-Effect logic clauses in many situations, and if shall consider the neutral opinions from my witnesses in my disclosure list, like former Senior students, former victim teacher Joshua Noriega, UCD Manager Evan McClintock, but not all district employees of the ; same interest group only in DPS? Q2-Are the tremendous quantity of facts true, including flip-flop of reassignments, zero classroom support, improved performance, racism, plotted RIB, : Non-Renew, stalking in job fair, sabotage in reference check, conspired investigation, refused commencement, canceling summer job, false affidavits, violation of Protection Order and PII-SSN? li Q3 -Are Salem, NCAS and DPS habitual cheaters or violators? Shown by public records, Salem was disciplined publicly by DPS since 2009 because he ruined the whole class of graduation, and discriminated against another staff. Hundreds of Teachers, including Michelle at NCAS, filed complaints in 2014 which resulted in the stipulated agreement between DPS and DCTA Teacher Union. DPS didn’t abide, and has accumulated more than 300 cases in Federal-Colorado EFC court system. Q4 -Are the Federal-Colorado systems corrupted in my case and on the basis of two national records? Judges implicitly suggested a bias because of “insubordinate” in Due Process, not only there have been severe massive negligence with 14-months delay, also some other legitimate issues.