Whether Judge Rentschler violated constitutional rights by denying judicial proceedings, granting summary judgment without constitutional oath, and interfering with First Amendment free exercise rights

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the trial court Judge Matthew Rentschler, (Judge Rentschler) violated the organic law and constitutional provisions to supplant his orders superseding and denying Petitioner’s rights to a judicial proceeding according to the course of the . common law and a jury of my peers secured by the conditions stated in the 1816 Enabling Act, Passed at the First Session of the Fourteenth Congress of the United States, U.S. Statutes at Large III, 289-291. (App.5a-6a) 2. Whether (Judge Rentschler) denied Petitioner’s ; Constitutional rights by granting Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgement in its entirety affirming (ELJ’s) Order of Dismissal when she has NO constitu. tional oath of office. (App.6a) 3. Whether (Judge Rentschler) had jurisdictional authority to repudiate (Petitioner's) constitutional right ' to the free exercise clause of the First Amendment, and enjoyment of religious opinions without interference of my right of conscience. (App.6a) 4. Whether (Judge Rentschler) had jurisdictional authority to deny (Petitioner’s) constitutional right to the free exercise clause of the First Amendment and enjoyment of religious opinions without interference of my right of conscience while knowing the Respond. ents intent was to force Petitioner against his will to ‘ contract against those protected rights. (App.6a) iil ,