Violation-of-constitutional-rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” Marburv v Madison. 5 US 187 (1 Cranch) (1803). Did The United States District Court For The District Of Maryland At Greenbelt and The United States Court Of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit violate my rights protected by 1867 Maryland Constitution Declaration of Rights Article 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 17, 19, 20, 23, 41, 44, 45, 46, 47 and 1866 Civil Rights Act and committed maladministration against the rights of we the people which is a violation of Virginia Bill of Rights 1864 Section 3? Also, did The United States District Court For The District Of Maryland At Greenbelt and The United States Court Of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit error ruling under an cooperative agreement (CO-OPTED) allowing an executive and legislative branch program (Comparative Negligence Section 7102 Title 42) to the bases of its ruling? Also, isn’t the said breach an act of war? Honorable Court has already ruled that one need not pick This up arms in order to “levy war” in US v Burr (1807) 4 Cranch (8 US) 4669, 2 L.Ed. 684. Also, isn’t my rights secured by the Constitution and therefore there can be no rulemaking or legislation which would abrogate them. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)? II Also, if fraud vitiates everything that it touches, and if giving aid and comfort to enemies of the Constitution is also an act of fraud, then when Legislative and Executive branch of government pass a law (Comparative Negligence Section 7102 Title 42) and respondent used it against we the people, then what Legislative and Executive branch of government participated in act of war against the rights of we the people? Also, because Iona Howard right’s protected by 1867 Maryland Constitution and United States Constitution, and because Iona Howard has the right, and patriotic duty under an implied oath, that we all have “trust protectors”, to protect the Constitution and herself against enemies of the Constitution, doesn’t this alone sustain Iona Howard Article IIT standing? Also, isn’t absolute and arbitrary power over the lives, liberty and property of freemen exists nowhere in a republic, not even in the largest majority Kentucky Constitution Bill of Rights: Text of Section 2? To claim otherwise doesn’t that give aid and comfort to enemies of the Constitution? Also, due to the nature of this case that exposes a serious national security and national emergency threat that is ongoing, and in light of the allegiance to the Oath of Office “Charter”, doesn’t moot any civil procedure rules, or the Executive and Legislative Branch Programs like Comparative Negligence Section 7102 Title 42, or other legal theories used to dismiss this case in order to avoid giving aid and comfort to enemies of the Constitution? Ill STATEMENT OF