Whether the Eleventh Circuit's decision improperly applied a reasonable jury standard instead of a reasonable officer standard in a qualified immunity analysis

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the Eleventh Circuit’s decision that relied on the district court’s use of a reasonable jury standard in a case arising from a law enforcement officer’s use of deadly force rather than the reasonable officer standard used under a qualified immunity analysis to deny interlocutory review is contrary to this Court’s jurisprudence regarding issues of qualified immunity. (i)