Whether the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework requires a plaintiff to disprove an employer's proffered reason for adverse employment action under Title VII

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether this Court should overrule McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973). 2. Whether step three of the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework requires a plaintiff to disprove the employer’s proffered reason for the adverse employment action, when the text of Title VII and Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), provide that an action may have more than one but-for cause or motivating factor.