No. 24-49

James E. Hitch v. The Frick Pittsburgh

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2024-07-16
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: adverse-action burden-of-proof causation civil-procedure civil-rights discrimination employment employment-law retaliation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether James E. Hitch has proven a claim for retaliation under the 'but for' causation test?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether James E. Hitch has proven a claim for retaliation under the “ but for” causation test?

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-23
Reply of James E. Hitch submitted.
Main Document
2024-08-14
Brief of The Frick Pittsburgh in opposition submitted.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2024-08-14
Brief of respondent The Frick Pittsburgh in opposition filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word CountMain DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2024-07-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 15, 2024)
PetitionCertificate of Word CountProof of ServicePetitionCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

James E. Hitch
Sharon Lynn Wigle — Sharon Lawruler L.L.C., Petitioner
Sharon Lynn Wigle — Sharon Lawruler L.L.C., Petitioner
The Frick Pittsburgh
Emily Rachel Mahler — Margolis Edelstein, Respondent
Emily Rachel Mahler — Margolis Edelstein, Respondent