Question not identified

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the Founding Father’s documentation of individual rights, such as the Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence, and Constitution, provide protective measures against the lack of protective personal financial services for American individuals as required by law? 2. Can the jurisdiction of the lower courts dismiss the responsibilities of the oath taken by the lower courts? Follow-Up Question: Can the lower courts, which may have conflicts of interest [financial stocks, money, and or represented organizations and or personal relations] by the judges involved [assigned and or influential to other judges], causing unconstitutional dismissal, and or denial, the right to a jury trial for the individual complaint? 3. Does the Constitution provide protected American citizen rights for an individual to be properly, effectively, and timely implemented against fraudulent financial debt claims by questionable and what appears to be antitrust organizations? 4. Does the Constitution allow other state and or federal laws to be implemented in additional protections, and relief if, what appears to be, a financial institution violating, and or discovered to contain, an antitrust operation to commit fraudulent actions against those additional laws beyond the Constitutional protections? Follow-Up Question: If federal law prohibits any financial institution from violating proper and effective financial responsibilities, does the Constitution promote relief to be awarded to the individuals who had their rights violated by that financial organization? 5. If evidence shows that both federal and state financial protective measures against financial fraud, antitrust abuse, and or neglect, by a financial organization, and or government entity that provides protective measures for financial interest, such as what appears to be gatekeeper judges, should victims of that financial abuse and negligence be able to recover damages and relief according to the protections of the Constitution? 6. Ifa financial organization, and or corporation, that has been found guilty of antitrust laws, and fraudulent activity, as non-trusting, and continues to accept federal, state, and intergovernmental funding from various governmental agencies such as, but not limited to, financial management of intergovernmental courts, [Charleston County Courts], Federal and State Retirement Benefits [Judges], Office of Personnel Management [OPM], South Carolina Treasury, et al, whereas does oversight of the use of funding fall under federal jurisdiction and allow the Federal Court to determine and provide judicial protective measures within the law that federally funding must provide and manage the protective measures to properly and effectively implement financial strongholds for the American individual? 7. Does preventing, and or denying, the right to jury trial violate individual rights of due process guaranteed under the Federal Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Declaration of Independence, regardless of age, disability, race, and or political status for judicial functionality of those protective rights? 2