No. 24-5119
Stacey Williams, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process mandatory-life-sentence mandatory-sentencing sentencing sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
due-process
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Whether Mr. Williams’s Count 1 conviction and corresponding life sentence violate his right to due process? I. Whether application of a 21 U.S.C. § 851 enhancement resulting in a mandatory life sentence violates Mr. Williams’s right to due process and Sixth Amendment rights? i LIST OF ALL
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-30
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-07-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 19, 2024)
Attorneys
Stacey Williams
Jarrod James Beck — Law Office of Jarrod J. Beck, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent