No. 24-6040
Graham L. Stowe v. Gregory Van Rybroek, Director, Mendota Mental Health Institute
Response WaivedIFP
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2025-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Wisconsin court's decision is contrary to and an unreasonable application of Foucha v. Louisiana because it permits the state to confine NGI acquittees in mental institutions even if they are not mentally ill
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED | Whether the Wisconsin court’s decision is contrary to and an unreasonable application of Foucha v. Louisiana because it permits the state to confine NGI acquittees in mental institutions even if they are | not mentally ill.
Docket Entries
2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-03
Waiver of right of respondent Gregory Van Rybroek to respond filed.
2024-11-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 26, 2024)
Attorneys
Graham Stowe
Colleen Marie Marion — Office of the State Public Defender, Petitioner
Gregory Van Rybroek
Lisa Ellen Fishering Kumfer — Wisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent