Whether the Tenth Circuit unreasonably determined the facts and violated the petitioner's Fourth Amendment rights during a traffic stop

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1). Why has The United State Court of Appeal For the Tenth Circuit entered a decision so far departed from the accepted and usual courts of judicial proceedings, based on an unreasonable determination of the facts, in light of the evidence presented in A Application For A Certificate of Appealability as to call for an exercise for this Court's supervisory power? What Petitioner, is stating is ; that the officers violated his Fourth Amendment rights because they lacked reasonable suspicion to extend the traffic stop after the issue of the ticket and the court is saying that Petitioner is argument is that the officers extend the traffic stop to issue a ticket. 2).Why has the The United State Court of Appeal For the Tenth Circuit entered a decision so far departed from the accepted and usual courts, of judicial proceedings, based on an unreasonable determination of the facts, in light of the evidence presented in A Application For A Certificate of Appealability as to call for an exercise for this Court 's supervisory. The argument of Petitioner is and has always being that Oklahoma Courts did not give me a full and fair opportunity to litigate those claims See 28 U.S.C § 2253 (c) (1)(A); MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-36 (2003)