No. 24-6206

Anthony Bowden, Sr. v. Office of Personnel Management

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2024-12-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-law disability-discrimination due-process federal-employment merit-system-protection-board reasonable-accommodation
Key Terms:
ERISA
Latest Conference: 2025-04-17 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Merit System Protection Board's decision discriminated against a person with a disability and disregarded Mr. Bowden's arguments due to mental and physical impairments

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Was Federal Appeals Court opinion to decision in the Bowden vs. OPM case discrimin 2. Was Mr. Bowden taken advantage of due to his mental dis by his arguments being disregarded and ruled as being n 3. Was Mr. Bowden given any accommodations due to his cause by federal on-the-job injuries?1. confirm the Merit System Protection Board (MSPB) ation against a person with a disability? ability by Federal Appeals Court on persuasive? mental and physical disability

Docket Entries

2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-17
Petitioner complied with order of February 24, 2025.
2025-02-24
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 17, 2025, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2025-02-12
Letter and supplemental appendix of petitioner received.
2025-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-16
Waiver of right of respondent Office of Personnel Management to respond filed.
2024-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 27, 2025)

Attorneys

Anthony Bowden
Anthony Bowden Sr. — Petitioner
Anthony Bowden Sr. — Petitioner
Office of Personnel Management
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent