Can companies be prosecuted without representative counsel when untainted assets are stripped, and do they qualify for the same constitutional protections as individuals under Luis v. U.S.?

here concern whether '"'Rowland v. California Men's Colony II" should be modified, clarified, or further addressed to answer the following questions: 1. Can companies, stripped of untainted assets, be prosecuted without representative counsel? 2. Do companies qualify for the same "representative counsel" protective rights offered individuals under "Luis v. U.S." wherein untainted assfets, designated to 'pay legal fees, are stripped from the companies, preventing the companies from hiring representative counsel in criminal matters? 3. Can "Rowland" be "weaponizea" in a criminal matter to deny companies constitutional rights of due process and representative counsel? (ii)