Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the wire-fraud statutes criminalize a deceptive statement that induces an ordinary commercial contract that the party who made the statement intends to fulfill, and whether the specific intent for wire fraud can be shown by evidence of a few failed contracts in an otherwise successful business
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
are 1. Whether the wire-fraud statutes criminalize a deceptive statement that induces an ordinary commercial contract that the party who made the statement intends to fulfill . 2. Whether the specific intent necessary to prove charge s of wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 and 1349 can be shown by evidence that a handful of contracts entered into by an ongoing business failed while the vast majority of the business’s contracts were fulfilled .
Docket Entries
2025-04-07
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/4/2025.
2025-03-06
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2025-01-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 6, 2025)
Attorneys
Leslie Robert Burk
Philip J. Lynch — Law Offices of Phil Lynch, Petitioner
Philip J. Lynch — Law Offices of Phil Lynch, Petitioner
United States
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent