Whether the Fourth Circuit's application of the vehicle search incident-to-arrest exception to the warrant requirement resolved the meaning of 'reasonable to believe' consistently with the plain language of Arizona v. Gant and with the broader Fourth Amendment framework set forth by this Court's associated precedent

Whether the Fourth Circuit’s application of the vehicle search incident -to-arrest exception to the warrant requirement resolved the meaning of “reasonable to believe” consistently with the plain language of Arizona v. Gant , 556 U.S. 332 (2009), and with the broader Fourth Amendment framework set forth by this Court’s associated precedent.