Whether a criminal defendant in a capital trial is deprived of his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process when the evidence supports voluntary intoxication negating specific intent, but the trial court fails to instruct the jury on lesser-included offenses

Whether a criminal defendant in a capital trial is deprived of his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process, as set forth in Beck v. Alabama, when the evidence at trial would support a finding of voluntary intoxication negating specific intent as an element of capital murder, but the trial court fails to instruct the jury to consider any lesser-included offenses to capital murder. i