No. 24A712
Steven Aiello, et al. v. United States
Tags: criminal-prosecution federal-fraud-statute honest-services-fraud right-to-control second-circuit wire-fraud
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the federal fraud statute's 'right to control' theory of honest services fraud is a valid basis for criminal prosecution after the Supreme Court's narrowing of federal fraud statutes
Docket Entries
2025-02-03
Order issued by Justice Sotomayor: Upon further consideration of the application of counsel for the applicants, the response filed thereto, and the reply,
it is ordered that the stay heretofore issued by the undersigned on January 22, 2025, is hereby vacated. The application for stay is, in all respects, denied.
2025-01-31
Reply of applicant Louis Ciminelli, et al. filed.
2025-01-29
Response in Opposition To the Application For Stay of the Mandate Issued by the United States Court of appeals for the Second Circuit of United States submitted.
2025-01-29
Response to application from respondent United States filed.
2025-01-22
Order issued by Justice Sotomayor: Upon consideration of the application of counsel for the applicants, it is ordered that the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, case Nos. 18-2990(L), 18-3710(Con), 18-3712(Con), 18-3715(Con), 18-3850(Con), is hereby stayed as applied to applicants Steven Aiello, Joseph Gerardi, Louis Ciminelli, and Alain Kaloyeros, pending further order of the undersigned or of the Court. It is further ordered that a response to the application be filed on or before Wednesday, January 29, 2025, by 5 p.m. (EST).
2025-01-17
Application (24A712) for a stay, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Louis Ciminelli, et al.
Paul D. Clement — Clement & Murphy, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent