Whether an officer's intended level of force and mistaken use of force impacts Fourth Amendment reasonableness and qualified immunity analysis in excessive force claims

1. In the Fourth Amendment reasonableness of a seizure context, whether a law enforcement officer’s intended level of force is relevant to determining whether an officer’s use -of-force should be analyzed under a deadly -use-of-force standard or a general use of-force standard? 2. In analyzing an excessive force claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, whether an officer’s mistaken use-of-force was higher than what he or she intended, entitles the officer to qualified immunity, so long as the mistake is reasonable under the circumstances?