No. 25-5985
Anne M. Lynch v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-law fiduciary-duty honest-services-fraud jury-instruction prosecutorial-discretion statutory-vagueness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw ERISA JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw ERISA JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-12-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner's payment violated the honest-services fraud statute; whether the district court's erroneous fiduciary duty jury instruction requires a new trial; whether 18 U.S.C. § 1346 is unconstitutionally vague
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether petitioner’s payment violated the honest-services fraud statute? Whether the district court’s erroneous fiduciary duty jury instruction requires a new trial? Whether 18 U.S.C. § 1346 is unconstitutionally vague?
Docket Entries
2025-12-08
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/5/2025.
2025-11-07
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-11-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-10-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 28, 2025)
Attorneys
Anne Lynch
Scott P. Lopez — Lawson & Weitzen, LLP, Petitioner
Scott P. Lopez — Lawson & Weitzen, LLP, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent